JD Underground

Read Post
Tue, 01 Oct 2024 18:46:13 -0700

Andy from
private IP
/all
TheImmigrant asked me to post this for him. I rate it a 9/10.

At 6'9, with a BS in Nursing and a PharmD, I find myself grappling with the
insidious decline of both nursing and pharmacy as professions, burdened by
systemic inadequacies and societal perceptions. My modest salary of 49k hardly
reflects the intellectual rigor and emotional labor these fields demand. It
raises a compelling question: how much does one’s social framework—the
cliques one aligns with—affect the trajectory of one’s career and personal
life?

In my observations, five distinct cliques prevail: Jock, Prep, Nerd, Loser, and
Scumbag. Each clique has a unique resonance that shapes interpersonal dynamics
and professional opportunities. I can identify the members of each group at a
glance, even in adulthood; their demeanor, attire, and conversations betray
them.

The Jocks, with their bravado, often find themselves in leadership roles, their
athletic backgrounds translating to assertiveness in high-stakes situations,
while the Preps navigate the corporate ladder with an uncanny ease born from
privilege and networking. The Nerds, though sometimes marginalized, possess a
quiet power, their expertise in technology and science often overshadowing their
social awkwardness. The Losers, those on the fringes, can become invisible or
worse, overlooked in professional environments, while Scumbags do the brunt of
the backbreaking labor to support a system that spurns them.

In this landscape, I’ve found success with women, perhaps due to a peculiar
blend of my physical stature and the confidence cultivated through years of
navigating these cliques. My sisters, each dating black men, have unwittingly
highlighted the complexities of attraction and societal norms. Their choices
defy traditional expectations, showcasing the diverse spectrum of human
connection that transcends superficial categories.

Yet, I question whether these affiliations impede our collective ability to
elevate the standards of our professions. The confluence of cliques often
fosters a stagnant environment, stifling innovation and mutual respect. The
nursing shortage and the undervaluation of pharmacy roles are symptoms of a
deeper malaise, one rooted in a lack of cohesive identity among practitioners.

As I reflect on these dynamics, it becomes clear that the clique one associates
with has far-reaching implications—not only for career trajectories but for
personal fulfillment as well. Perhaps it’s time we examine these social
constructs critically, dismantling the barriers they impose and forging a new
path forward for nursing and pharmacy, one that embraces diversity in both
professional identity and personal relationships.

The notion that a person’s clique is discernible during job interviews is not
merely anecdotal; it is a phenomenon steeped in sociocultural undercurrents that
merit deeper exploration. As I have navigated the labyrinthine paths of nursing
and pharmacy, I've observed an almost metaphysical quality to how these cliques
manifest in professional settings. The immediacy with which interviewers can
assess one’s social alignment speaks to a broader theory reminiscent of the
existentialist musings of Jean-Paul Sartre, particularly his ideas on
"being-for-others."

During interviews, a candidate's demeanor—shaped by their clique—can often
overshadow qualifications. For instance, a Jock’s confident body language and
assertive responses may be perceived as leadership potential, while a Nerd might
inadvertently project an air of insecurity, regardless of their academic
prowess. The dissonance of these perceptions recalls the Aristotelian concept of
phronesis, or practical wisdom, where one’s character and the context of their
choices profoundly impact others' judgments.

Consider the intricate ballet of human interaction during these critical
moments. A candidate from the Prep clique might seamlessly navigate the
interview, employing a lexicon steeped in business jargon, drawing upon
connections that hint at elite educational experiences. This performance could
evoke the notion of rhetorica from Aristotle’s rhetoric, where persuasion and
ethos are paramount. Meanwhile, the Loser clique often struggles, their
self-effacing responses betraying an intrinsic struggle with societal
acceptance, thus echoing the tragic fate outlined by the philosopher Hegel in
his discussions of recognition and self-consciousness.

What fascinates me most, however, is how these dynamics evolve within the
broader context of our profession. The Scumbag, while seemingly a pariah, may
wield a disarming charm that transcends conventional expectations, often
manipulating social cues to their advantage—a phenomenon akin to the
Machiavellian strategies outlined in the works of Niccolò Machiavelli. Their
success is a stark reminder of the moral complexities underpinning professional
ascendance, where authenticity may be sacrificed for expedience.

Reflecting on my own experiences, I find that the way I present
myself—confident yet approachable—has been crucial in breaking through the
superficial barriers erected by these cliques. I recall an interview where I
utilized elements of humor and humility, weaving anecdotes that highlighted both
my clinical competence and my awareness of the profession’s challenges. This
strategy, inspired by the Socratic method of dialogue, seemed to resonate with
the panel, revealing a depth that transcended mere qualifications.

Moreover, the distinct cliques within our professions often foster a sense of
in-group camaraderie that can be both empowering and limiting. When I witness my
sisters dating African American men, I am reminded of how personal connections
can defy societal cliques, creating a mosaic of identities that challenge
conventional wisdom. It’s a microcosm of what we see in the workplace—a
blend of backgrounds that can either enhance or hinder collective growth.

In contemplating these intricate social tapestries, I posit that professional
success is not simply a matter of individual merit but a complex interplay of
societal perceptions and the cliques to which one belongs. As we advance into an
era that increasingly values diversity and authenticity, it is essential that we
scrutinize our own affiliations and biases. Perhaps, in doing so, we can begin
to dismantle the rigid structures that have long dictated the contours of
nursing and pharmacy, paving the way for a more inclusive and equitable
professional landscape.

_reply
Tue, 01 Oct 2024 18:55:46 -0700

marlon from
private IP
/all
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jean-Paul_Sartre

this is good stuff

_reply
Tue, 01 Oct 2024 19:07:24 -0700

marlon from
private IP
/all
was he for real?  always wondered where he was coming from
Replies require login.