Read Post
Sun, 03 May 2026 07:03:13 -0700
marlon from private IP, post #19414380
/all
Ferguson’s Law
https://www.hoover.org/research/fergusons-law-debt-service-military-spending-and-fiscal-limits-power
Ferguson’s Law: Debt Service, Military Spending, and the Fiscal Limits of Power
Are there financial determinants of great-power decline and fall? This paper proposes “Ferguson’s Law,” which states that any great power that spends more
on debt servicing than on defense risks ceasing to be a great power.
Friday, February 21, 2025 1 min read
By: Sir Niall Ferguson
Research Team: Hoover History Lab, Applied History Working Group
Military
Ferguson’s Law: Debt Service, Military Spending, and the Fiscal Limits of Power
By: Sir Niall Ferguson
ABSTRACT: Are there financial determinants of great-power decline and fall? This paper proposes “Ferguson’s Law,” which states that any great power that
spends more on debt servicing than on defense risks ceasing to be a great power. The paper identifies the “Ferguson limit,” or the point at which interest
payments exceed defense spending, as the tipping point after which the centripetal forces of the aggregate debt burden tend to pull apart the geopolitical grip
of a great power. This is because the debt burden draws scarce resources towards itself, reducing the amount available for national security, and leaving the
power increasingly vulnerable to military challenge. Using historical case studies that are analogous to the situation of the modern United States as the
dominant global power, the paper shows that it is very rare but not unprecedented for a great power to return to the right side of the Ferguson limit. The paper
is timely, as the United States began violating Ferguson’s Law for the first time in nearly a century in 2024.
Sun, 03 May 2026 07:05:02 -0700
marlon from private IP
Reply #14827894
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/markets/ar-AA22fvRp
Interest on US debt is becoming a top driver of future deficits, as the sheer size of past borrowing overwhelms the fiscal outlook
U.S. debt is expected to continue soaring in the coming decades not because of excesses committed by future lawmakers, although that’s certainly possible, but
because interest payments on past borrowing will increasingly dominate spending.
Americans got a reminder of that outlook as the U.S. crossed a grim fiscal threshold this week, when first-quarter data confirmed debt is now bigger than the
economy.
As of March 31, debt held by the public stood at $31.27 trillion, while nominal GDP over the prior 12-month period was an estimated $31.22 trillion, pushing the
debt-to-GDP ratio to 100.2%
“US sovereign debt has hit levels where interest expense is becoming a primary driver of the deficit. In a ‘Fiscal Dominance’ regime, the Fed’s ability
to aggressively hike rates to curb inflation is constrained, as doing so risks a fiscal or financial crisis,” analysts at Deutsche Bank said in a note on
Thursday, adding that such an environment often encourages higher-for-longer inflation.
Federal budget deficits are already tracking at more than $2 trillion this fiscal year, adding to the mountain of debt, with interest payments alone headed for
$1 trillion.
Interest costs will soar to $2.1 trillion by 2036, when publicly held debt is expected to balloon to 120% of GDP, according to the Congressional Budget Office.
An earlier analysis from Deutsche Bank pointed out that the CBO assumes the primary deficit—the shortfall between revenue and spending excluding interest
payments on debt—is expected to remain relatively stable over the next decade and beyond at about 2% of GDP.
That’s the view even as spending on Social Security and Medicare will jump to account for the growing numbers of baby boomers heading into retirement.
But after including interest payments, the total deficit will steadily widen from around 6% of GDP today to nearly 10% by the mid 2050s.
The gap between primary and total deficits has historically been narrow, analysts said in February, but it started growing in the years after COVID, when
massive spending blew up the deficit and high inflation forced the Federal Reserve to hike interest rates aggressively.
The CBO’s forecast also assumes interest rates and nominal GDP growth largely remain steady, meaning the future debt surge isn’t due to higher borrowing
costs or an economic slowdown.
“Those assumptions could, of course, prove wrong in either direction,” Deutsche Bank said. “But even if they hold, it is clear that the sheer size of the
outstanding debt stock is becoming a far more significant driver of deficits than it was even at the start of this decade. As a result, future US
administrations may increasingly find that fiscal policy is constrained not by their willingness to run primary deficits, but by the need to manage the debt
stock itself in order to meet broader fiscal ambitions.”
Interest on U.S. debt is becoming a top driver of future deficits, as the sheer size of past borrowing overwhelms the fiscal outlook
Interest on U.S. debt is becoming a top driver of future deficits, as the sheer size of past borrowing overwhelms the fiscal outlook
Fiscal ambitions have since become more ambitious. The war against Iran has severely depleted inventories of the most expensive munitions in the U.S. arsenal,
requiring a costly restocking effort.
The Trump administration also seeks to boost the Pentagon’s budget by nearly half to $1.5 trillion a year as it eyes a transformation of the defense
industrial base to produce greater quantitates and more advanced weapons.
But sources told The Washington Post earlier this year that White House budget chief Russell Vought was among the critics of giving the Pentagon an additional
$500 billion, warning on its potential impact on the federal deficit.
His aversion to seeing the deficit widen further on the back of a bigger military bill highlights a phenomenon observed by historian Niall Ferguson, who has
said any great power that spends more on debt servicing than on defense risks ceasing to be a great power.
“This is because the debt burden draws scarce resources towards itself, reducing the amount available for national security, and leaving the power
increasingly vulnerable to military challenge,” he wrote.
In fact, the U.S. hit reached this threshold in 2024 and continues to meet the conditions for “Ferguson’s Law.” Of course, ratcheting up defense outlays
to $1.5 trillion would put the Pentagon budget back above debt-servicing costs, but only temporarily. Even without the added military spending, interests costs
are expected top $2 trillion next decade.
The CBO’s sobering outlook may even be a bit optimistic. While it sees interest rates and GDP growth largely holding steady over the long term, there are
years in the 2030s when borrowing costs will outpace the economy.
“Later in the decade, under CBO’s baseline, the average interest rate on all federal debt will exceed nominal economic growth, which could represent the
start of a debt spiral,” the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget said in February.
Diary of a CEO founder says he hired someone with 'zero' work experience because she 'thanked the security guard by name' before the interview
America’s twin scarcities: The 4-million-unit shortage in both housing and childcare is breaking families
Sam Altman says the quiet part out loud, confirming some companies are 'AI washing' by blaming unrelated layoffs on the technology
Sun, 03 May 2026 16:18:19 -0700
whiteguyinchina from private IP
Reply #11095927
Make big banks great again!
Sun, 03 May 2026 21:21:41 -0700
doublefriedchicken from private IP
Reply #17427370
Whatever. Nobody cares about the deficit. The assumption is that AI will fix this.
Replies require login.
