Found attachment of size 84143.
Fri, 21 Feb 2025 03:06:48 -0800 zerosugar from private IP, post #15906337 /all the curious case of madeleine mccann i am not sure if many of you remember this case of this little girl from leicester, england whose parents left her in a portugal hotel room to have dinner with friends on this resort then claim they returned and she wasn’t there. anyway, there has been this strange polish woman named julia wandelt for a few years who has claimed to be madeleine grown up. from the beginning, i felt she didn’t really look like maddie. julia seems to have a skin tone that appears warmer and very slightly darker. more of a fitzpatrick 2 or 3. on the other hand, maddie had a skin tone that is pretty much only found in the british isles. it’s a fitzpatrick 1. people everywhere else in europe and even those of nordic ancestry despite the fact that nordics are known for whiteness just don’t have fitzpatrick 1. they have 2 or 3 because they can still tan. not to get off topic, there were a few other features that just didn’t seem like maddie. of course people can change as they get older. however, there is one thing both maddie and julia have that’s extremely rare, this extremely rare eye condition where it sort of looks like the pupil is spilling into the iris called colomba. well at the time i learned about them sharing this rare eye condition, i tried to rationalize in my head that it was just a coincidence and maybe julia who has possibly studied the case is using her eye condition to exploit the situation. julia later took a dna test that revealed her heritage to be polish, romanian, and lithuanian. she apologized to the mccanns. now, she claims a new dna test reveals english and irish ancestry. obviously there can be issues with heritage dna tests, but the mccanns still will not take a dna test with julia. hair samples have revealed a possible link too. i get this is traumatic for them, but i would just want to get it over with if i were the parents if i really believed she wasn’t maddie. some hardcore followers of this case believe it’s fishy and point out that the mccanns have benefitted economically from the disappearance of their daughter. now they had her arrested for stalking… wow just wow. seems like an attempt to shut her down and avoid a dna test. they can end the madness by just taking one, why would they not want to take it? again, i never believed she was maddie in the past, but now im totally starting to think something is up and maybe she is not lying. https://news.sky.com/story/amp/woman-who-claimed-to-be-madeleine-mccann-charged-with-stalking-13313732 https://www.the-sun.com/news/7443289/what-madeleine-mccann-eye-defect-coloboma-rare-cause/amp/ https://nypost.com/2025/02/18/world-news/polish-woman-who-claims-to-be-madeleine-mccann-releases-bombshell-new-dna-test-results/ #News Fri, 21 Feb 2025 07:48:25 -0800 zerosugar from private IP Reply #13751825 another possibility is that they know madeline is gone, so the dna test is pointless. whether she is madeleine or not, this keeps the story relevant. i’m not saying they killed their daughter in cold blood, but what if they gave her something to sleep while they went out to the restaurant and they returned and she was dead or what if she had some sort of an accident unsupervised. Mon, 24 Feb 2025 16:46:25 -0800 zerosugar from private IP Reply #15276932 Im shocked JDU aren’t interested in this case, but were previously interested in Jon Benet Ramsey. I do find Maddie’s case actually more bizarre considering it’s possible she could still be alive or rather that her parents have put forth claims she was kidnapped and no body was ever found. I also remember years ago when this “kidnapping” first happened and it was such a conversation piece on early 4chan.Replies require login.